As a recent high school student, I can empathize with those who either dropped out or wanted to. Personally, I never wanted to drop out due to the fourth grade when I decided it was my dream to become an architect and design treehouses for writers (maybe me someday) to live in. Nevertheless, imagine yourself as a sixteen year old with no career aspirations, struggling to find meaning in your classes and piles of homework. Think how incredibly frustrating it would be to spend five years struggling to survive your math classes whilst dealing with the typical dramas of adolescence. If you had no career plans or were not a lover of mathematics, you'd note how pointless your math classes were and wonder why in the hell you were learning the quadratic equation. The same can be said for Literary Composition 9-12 or the sequence of sciences: Physics, Biology, and Chemistry. Why does the average person need chemistry? The answer to that question is (as said by multiple Beaverton School District Counselors), "People should have a well rounded education behind them". This could be translated as, "People should have a load of useless knowledge in their heads so that nothing actually important can take up space" or "You learn what we tell you to learn". Yes, chemistry would be important for a would-be chemist, chemistry teacher, or someone who wanted to be in pharmaceuticals to know. But everyone?In other words, the educational system does not adequately prepare you for college, a future career, or life in general. The system is inflexible and not designed for students to succeed in the long term. Everyone basically goes through the same curriculum no matter their dreams or talents.
![]() |
This is the basic path most students take
with minor changes based on student choice.
|
Strictly speaking, the schools should not expect that signing a poster will keep students from dropping out. A new form of education that is personalized to the student is needed. The standard one size fits all does not work.

I agree with you entirely. Today's curriculum is a one-size-fits-all -- which, of course, means that it fits no one. I can see teaching math if they allowed the teacher to tailor it to student interests, or have the students pose the problems they came across every day. The burden should be on educators/education to demonstrate the purpose of curriculum.
ReplyDeleteYes, that would make sense. Teachers should explain how what they're teaching can be used in real life.
Delete